From RBOSE
On "banning" and alternative communication management tools
This text is a study on how communication management systems within different plaforms and communities developed alternative ways to restrict and/or adapt information flow. It will form the basis from which new steps can be taken, in terms of moving away from the concept of "banning" persons, instead of restricting or filtering information flow. It will provide the raw material and factual consensus for the framework of the Communication Analysis Node of RBOSE. The document will also serve as a test drive of the linear scheme for applying the scientific method to problem solving, presented by Crawford S, Stucki L (1990) in "Peer review and the changing research record", "J Am Soc Info Science", vol. 41, pp 223-228. Making this the starting point ensures that the wheel is not reinvented, but instead collaborativly developed into something that can be put on one of the main axles of our ever expanding understanding of communication.
1.Define the question
(Take note of that this is not a topic under which to brainstorm. State questions you know that you have the capacity to develop.)
With our current technological achievements and knowledge in mind:
- Is banning the most effective way to reinforce a transparent structure within a communication media based on open-source philosophy and programming? (Kman)
- How much of the communication management can be automated?(Kman)
- How can a positive peer pressure, and group awareness, reinforce a harmonious discussion? (Make a guide for people on how to identify abusive behaviors and step in i a calm manner and point people in the right direction?) (this question needs clarification/Kman)
-(add question you want to start from)
2.Gather information and resources
3.Form hypothesis
4.Perform experiment and collect data
5.Analyze data
6.Interpret data and draw conclusions that serve as a starting point for new hypothesis
7.Publish results
8.Retest (frequently done by other reviewers)